Yale University became the first school to officially rescind the admission of a student linked to the college admissions scandal on Monday. A dozen coaches, university administrators and others facing racketeering chargesbefore a Boston judge, reports CBS News’ Carter Evans.
More than two dozen parents are scheduled for court appearances before the end of next week and one attorney insists the indictment does not tell the whole story. While most of the parents indicted in the scandal will be in court on Friday, two of the most high-profile defendants,, are expected in court next Wednesday.
Another 22 of those indicted will appear in court this week, and there could be more indictments to come. The scam’s mastermind,, said he worked with nearly 800 families, but only 33 parents are charged. At least one unidentified parent allegedly made a payment of $6.5 million.
Among those who pleaded not guilty Monday were a tennis coach from Georgetown and the water polo coach from the University of Southern California. They are accused of taking bribes to get undeserving students into some of the nation’s most elite schools.
The attorney for the Wake Forest University volleyball coach, accused of taking $100,000 to accept a wait-listed student, said his client does not belong in the indictment.
Donna Heinel, the former associate athletic director at USC, is accused of taking bribes to designate more than two dozen students as “recruited athletes,” including the daughters of actress Lori Loughlin and her husband, Mossimo Giannulli.
Heinel’s attorney defended her saying, “We look forward to reviewing the government’s evidence and fully restoring Donna’s reputation.”
Gregory Colburn is one of the indicted parents and for the first time, we’re hearing from his attorney. Colburn and his wife Amy are accused of paying Singer’s foundation $25,000 to have a proctor take the SAT’s for their son. Their apparent admission was recorded in a wiretapped conversation with Singer but their attorney told CBS News their son took the test himself and said there’s no evidence the proctor corrected his answers.
“I don’t think it’s fair to say that this case is a slam dunk,” said former federal prosecutor Laurie Levinson. “Even though they have an insider, he’s a vulnerable insider, and those wiretaps, what we know, might not tell the whole story.”
Source: CBS News
Photo Credit: Los Angeles Times
Photo Credit: CBS News